Doctorate of Health Sciences
Discipline: Other
Type of Paper: Article review
Academic Level: High school
Paper Format: APA
Question
****PLEASE REFER TO THE PICOT QUESTION IN THE UPLOADED FILE AND PLEASE INCLUDE THE QUESTION AT THE BEGINNING OF THE PAPER*****
The heading can be "PICOT Question"
The purpose of this assignment is to appraise 2-3 current*** you can just use 2 articles.**** (i.e., within the past 5 years), peer-reviewed, quantitative research articles that are relevant to a focused question of interest to you. Be sure to present your question in PICOT format.
For each article:
Provide the complete reference in current APA formatting.
Respond to all of the Overview Questions for Critical Appraisal of Quantitative Studies questions in Box 5.1 (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2015, p. 88). *** PLEASE SEE ATTACHED FILE***
Identify the study design type used in the research article, and specify this in your paper. Locate the Rapid Critical Appraisal Questions specific to the design type for your selected article (Chapter 5). Respond to all of the questions within the box.
This assignment should be 4-6 pages, not including the title and references pages. Follow current APA formatting and scholarly writing guidelines. *****Present each article separately. Please attach your research journal articles to your assignment submission.*******
PLEASE SEND ME THE 2 ARTICLES YOU USED
Critical Appraisal of Articles Paper Rubric
M7 Critical Appraisal of Articles Paper Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFocused PICOT question
21 to >18.87 pts
A
All PICOT components of the appropriate template question have been included in the correct order.
18.87 to >16.77 pts
B
Not all of the PICOT components of the appropriate template question have been included or are not in the correct order.
16.77 to >14.67 pts
C
The appropriate PICOT template question has not been identified correctly or only a few components of the template question have been included or are not in the correct order.
14.67 to >0 pts
F
A PICOT question template has not been identified and used in formulating the focused PICOT question.
21 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProvided complete reference in APA format for each article
19.5 to >17.53 pts
A
Complete references in APA formatting have been provided for each appraised article.
17.53 to >15.58 pts
B
Complete references in APA formatting have been provided for most of the appraised articles.
15.58 to >13.63 pts
C
Complete references in APA formatting have been provided for only one of the appraised articles or the formatting has been incorrect for most of the appraised articles.
13.63 to >0 pts
F
Complete references in APA formatting have not been provided for the articles.
19.5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResponded to all of the Overview Questions for Critical Appraisal of Quantitative Studies for the selected articles
30 to >26.97 pts
A
Responded correctly to all of the Overview Questions for Critical Appraisal of Quantitative Studies for each of the selected articles.
26.97 to >23.97 pts
B
Responded to most of the Overview Questions for each of the selected articles or responded to all of the questions, but some responses were incorrect.
23.97 to >20.97 pts
C
Responded only to some of the Overview Questions for each of the selected articles or responded to questions for only some of the articles, or many responses were incorrect.
20.97 to >0 pts
F
Did not respond to the Overview Questions for any of the articles or most responses were incorrect.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResponded to the Rapid Critical Appraisal Questions specific to the study design types for the selected articles
30 to >26.97 pts
A
Responded correctly to all of the Rapid Critical Appraisal Questions specific to the appropriate study designs for each of the selected articles.
26.97 to >23.97 pts
B
Responded to most of the Rapid Critical Appraisal Questions specific to the appropriate study designs for each of the selected articles; or incorrectly selected one of the study design types; or responded to all of the questions, but some responses were incorrect.
23.97 to >20.97 pts
C
Responded only to some of the Rapid Critical Appraisal Questions specific to the appropriate study designs for each of the selected articles; or incorrectly selected more than one of the study design types; or many responses were incorrect.
20.97 to >0 pts
F
Did not respond to the Rapid Critical Appraisal Questions for any of the articles or selected the incorrect study design types or most responses were incorrect.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization
25.5 to >22.92 pts
A
Excellent structure and organization of content; includes 2-3 current, peer-reviewed journal articles that provide high-level support and are presented separately; stays within the 4-6 page limit; attaches the articles to the assignment submission.
22.92 to >20.37 pts
B
Good overall organization; includes 2-3 articles, but not all of these are current, peer-reviewed journal articles or provide high-level support; stays within the 4-6 page limit; attaches articles to the assignment submission.
20.37 to >17.82 pts
C
Some organization; includes at least 1 article; exceeds or falls below the page limit; does not attach all articles to the assignment submission.
17.82 to >0 pts
F
No organization or structure; lacks articles or articles are not presented separately; exceeds or falls below the page limit; does not attach articles to the assignment submission.
25.5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and APA
24 to >21.57 pts
A
Excellent grammar and APA formatting throughout the assignment.
21.57 to >19.17 pts
B
A few errors in grammar and APA but overall well done.
19.17 to >16.77 pts
C
Shows a pattern of errors in spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation, as well as errors with APA formatting.
16.77 to >0 pts
F
Continuous grammatical and APA formatting errors throughout the assignment.
24 pts
Total Points: 150